Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Southern Cultures Presents: Memory

"Southern Cultures has just released a special issue devoted entirely to
Memory. We've also updated our online archives in many subject areas and
are again offering free CDs and DVDs for use in classrooms during the coming
academic year."

The Memory issue features:
--Peter S. Carmichael on why Robert E. Lee provokes so much argument;
--Alice Walker, Randall Kenan, Allan Gurganus, Joe Flora, Elizabeth Spencer,
Godfrey Cheshire, Kenneth Turan, and Andrew Garrison on their favorite
Southern films;
--what to do about the Thomas Ruffin statue;
--memories of World War II Appalachia;
--new poetry from Robert Morgan;
--baseball legend Catfish Hunter and his hometown remembered;
--an interview with the Grandmother of Appalachian Studies;
--scenes from wartime Hot Springs, Arkansas;
--and more.

50,000 students and scholars from over 70 countries have read Southern
Cultures in the past year, and all of our content from the last decade is
available online by subject area and by issue at:
http://www.southerncultures.org/content/read/

To read the current issue on Memory or to read about our free media for
classroom use, please visit:

Dave Shaw

Call for Essays: Crossroads of Memory

Call for essays: Culture Theory and Critique special themed issue on
Crossroads of Memory

This special issue on the “Crossroads of Memory” seeks to bring together
scholars of various literary and cultural traditions eager to bring into
dialogue different theoretical approaches to memory. For prominent Memory
Studies critic Pierre Nora, historiography represents the unified language
of nationalism with its sanctioned institutions and apparatuses, while
memory is the dialect of particular loci: regional, local, familial, ethnic,
or racial. Nora’s distinction between history and memory is increasingly
questioned in various disciplines. “Crossroads of Memories” is a
contribution to this questioning. Are mobilizations of the past uniquely
local, national, or global?

This collection seeks a more dynamic view of memory that localizes it
simultaneously in multiple spheres: private and public; local, regional, and
transnational; in written texts and non-written artifacts. Unlike Nora’s
seminal concept of realms of memory, the crossroads of memory would
illuminate how memories can simultaneously carry multiple meanings according
to one’s positioning. Embodied in the metaphor of the crossroads where flows
of populations and cultures meet and leave trails, multilocality often
highlights how memories shift as they circulate within and across local,
national, and ethnic communities. The crossroads, thus, represents a site
where multiple or different kinds of memory are constantly juxtaposed,
contested, rearticulated, and mediated according to different individual
social class, needs, historical contexts, and political ends. As such, the
crossroads demonstrates the potency of conflict and power dynamics
(evidenced in censorship and silences) in the emergence and representation
of collective memories.

We invite essays that explore tensions among different conceptualizations of
memory.

Possible areas of examination include, but are not restricted to:

Race, ethnicity, or immigration and memory

Social class and memory

Memory and space. Localizing memories in museums, monuments, landscape,
cityscape, etc.

Performative memories

Duty to memory

Visual culture and memory

We welcome essays that address any of these issues. The questions are not
meant to be proscriptive, however, and we welcome queries about possible
article content. We welcome submissions from graduate students.

Essays need to be submitted for peer review by Oct 1, 2011; length of final
essays to be 5,000-7,000 words including notes.

Send abstracts and essays to Jen Heusel, editorial assistant to
ctcjourn@indiana.edu

Culture, Theory and Critique is a refereed, interdisciplinary journal for
the transformation and development of critical theories in the humanities
and social sciences. It aims to critique and reconstruct theories by
interfacing them with one another and by relocating them in new sites and
conjunctures. Culture, Theory and Critique' approach to theoretical
refinement and innovation is one of interaction and hybridization via
recontextualization and transculturation.

Kendall Leon recently defended her dissertation about Chicana subjectivity and Chicana rhetoric. Her stance on interrogating the self-identification of "Chicana" and her aim to complicate rhetorical studies is unique and worthy of an audience in the present and future. Leon's work makes me think about the ways in which "Chicana" works in various contexts and the ways in which it is ideological. Please visit the link and read about the specifics of her dissertation.

It's great to be back posting and updating this blog. I will not be moving the blog to WordPress because it would create too much confusion. I'm hoping the readership will pick up within the rest of this year. If not, I will forge ahead with more updates, news, and notes about rhetorical memory.

The update at the moment is that I am beginning a book proposal based on my dissertation about rhetorical memory. I hope to continue the updates as I am composing the proposal. There's more ahead so I hope you all will stay tuned to this blog!

Until next time....

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Call for Papers: "Memories and Violence"

Encounters: An International Journal for the Study of Culture and
Society
(Edited by Zayed University, Dubai) invites submissions for an special issue on *Memories and Violence: Problems and Debates in a Global Perspectives*. Guest Editor Alejandro Castillejo-Cuéllar (Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia).

Understanding the ways in which societies have experienced multiple forms of violence has been at the forefront of a number of academic debates in the last few decades. Of great importance to these debates is the question of how a violent past is socially articulated in the present. How do societies and specific communities render meaningful a violent past? How is the process of memorializing connected to the broader cultural and political landscape? What are the connections between memory, identity and community? Between silence and speech? This special number of Encounters will explore these questions across different regional contexts and historical experiences. Contributions that rethink the connections between memories and violence are particularly welcome.

Please submit your paper (6,000 to 10,000 words) electronically in MS Word format to acastill@uniandes.edu.co by August 1st, 2011. For further information see: http://encounters.zu.ac.ae

*Encounters: An International Journal for the Study of Culture and
Society *promotes and publishes scholarship from the humanities and the social sciences, and their intersections on topics related to the encounters of cultures, intellectual traditions, and social and political systems across space and time. The journal seeks a critical understanding of the transcultural and transnational factors that shape such encounters --and by extension, the world as we know it. The editors encourage contributions that explicitly link the humanities and the social sciences and engage their different methodologies. Regular special volumes will offer stimulating, focused engagement with specific historical, political, cultural, social or theoretical questions. Encounters will be peer-reviewed and published biannually. ISSN 2075-048X. Distribution by I.B. Tauris http://www.ibtauris.com

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Collective Memory: An Academic Conference

HSA Conference: Collective Memory Sessions

The primary goal of the History Students Association's upcoming
conference on collective memory is to facilitate a discussion that
explores the ongoing production of collective memory and the
historical contingencies that influence the manner by which it is
organized and allocated. The questions guiding our conversation will
not only emphasize the processes and systems that bring about the idea
of a unified past, but will also take into consideration the notion
that individual and collective consciousness operate both within and
outside of these formalized and often prefabricated frameworks. As
such, our interests are not limited to understanding the political and
economic issues surrounding the idea of collective memory, but also
include the discontinuities and silences that often characterize the
construction and circulation of memory across space and time. By
taking this broad approach to examining the form, function, and
content of collective memory and its impact on historical change, we
hope to touch on a wide array of topics spanning national and cultural
borders, thereby giving participants the opportunity to engage with
all facets of this rich and informative topic of academic inquiry.

PANELS & KEYNOTE SPEAKERS:

[10:00am - 11:35pm] SESSION I: Collective Memory & Visual Culture
Keynote Speaker #1: Volker M. Langbehn, Ph.D., "Visual Memory and the
Forgetfulness of History"
+ 3 graduate student presenters.

[12:35pm - 2:10pm] SESSION II: Collective Memory, Race & Culture
Keynote Speaker #2: Trevor Getz, Ph.D., "Is History the Enemy of
Memory?: Official Representations and Popular Conceptions of the Past
in Post-Apartheid South Africa"
+ 3 graduate student presenters.

[2:25pm - 4:00pm] SESSION III: Collective Memory & Social Trauma
Keynote Speaker #3: Stephen V. Bittner, Ph.D., "Moscow's Neighborhood
of Myth and Memory"
+ 3 graduate student presenters.

For more information — including a complete conference schedule,
registration information, and on-campus directions — please click on
the following URL:
http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~hsa/activities/collective_memory_conference/

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Book Review: The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader

I was recently asked by the Smithsonian Latino Virtual Museum (LVM) to write a book review of a monograph by a Latina/o for a Latina/o audience. I want to share this review for all audiences here on my blog because the book I have chosen to review is one that should be read by all.

Book Review:

The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, Gloria E. Anzaldúa. AnaLouise Keating, ed. Duke University Press, January 2009.

The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader is one of many important texts recently published within Latino letters and Latino scholarship. Its significance is due to its emphasis on issues currently affecting Latinas/os in the United States. Born and raised in South Texas, Gloria E. Anzaldúa became and remains one of the leading feminist/philosopher/activist writers to describe and theorize the meaning of colonization, nationalism, identity, difference, and spirituality. In the late 1970s, her co-edited anthology This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color argued for an all-inclusive feminist and ethnic discourse. Her autobiography Borderlands: La Frontera: The New Mestiza, published in 1987, followed with an argument about challenging ways of thinking in order to achieve personal and communal transformation. Both her anthology and autobiography have since become and remain central texts in Chicana/o Studies, Feminist Studies, Cultural Studies, and Queer Theory.

Close friend and writing partner, AnaLouise Keating has posthumously anthologized a collection of Anzaldúa’s unpublished writings as a reader that attempts to illuminate the wide range of Anzaldúa’s thoughts about writing, spirituality, sexuality, gender, and race/ethnicity. A decade ago, Keating worked with Anzaldúa to publish a series of interviews titled Interviews/Entrevistas published by Routledge. Recently, Keating collaborated on another anthology with Anzaldúa titled This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation. Keating’s editorial decisions in The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader fulfill the attempt to expand Anzaldúa’s commitment to social change by arguing for coalition building, politicizing art, and spiritual activism in a series of poems, essays, and visual sketches.

Anthologized for new readers and Anzaldúa scholars alike, Keating structures the reader to expand Anzaldúa’s ideas about writing, spirituality, gender/race, and activism—which were also central topics in This Bridge and Borderlands. In Part 1 of The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, for example, Keating presents poems, essays, and interviews written before the publication of This Bridge. This particular collection presents Anzaldúa’s early commitment to challenge readers/writers to consider the spiritual aspects of writing and to think more closely about the interrelationship between spirituality, sexuality, and the body. Part 2 presents writings featuring Anzaldúa’s more theoretical work about difference, identity, and coalition building. The essay titled “To(o) Queer the Writer—Loca—escritora y chicana” is a memorable essay that presents a deliberation about the challenges facing gay and lesbian writers with regard to re-thinking the meaning of sex, sexuality, writing and identity. Though previously published, Keating offers the essay as a means to argue Anzaldúa’s important presence within Queer Theory—an area of inquiry which Keating believes had previously excluded Anzaldúa.

Another highlight, and newly published, is the essay titled “On the Process of Writing Borderlands/La Frontera” where Anzaldúa writes about the exigencies that prompted the writing of her 1987 autobiography. This is an important essay for new readers of Borderlands because it contextualizes much of the complexity of the autobiography. The essay should be significant to scholars who may argue that argumentative and textual gaps appear in her autobiographical text. This section is also important as it contains specific ideas about Anzaldúa’s nationalist development of a “Mestiza Nation,” which she considered a multicultural movement. This section and essay should definitely be of importance to activists and scholars interested in the creation of social movements.

Part 3 of the book continues to expand Anzaldúa’s ideas by presenting a series of images, drawings, and sketches—all of which center her ideas about Nepantla, shapeshifting, border crossing, and identity re-construction—all of which are important elements in Anzaldúa’s explanation of a “mestiza consciousness.” This section emphasizes Anzaldúa’s interest in visual images and art, which remained politicized and historical all throughout her life’s written work. The last part of the reader contains writings that continue to be theoretical in nature and expand her vision about creating and sustaining social change. For example, she writes about the effects of 9/11 and its meaning for both personal and communal healing. She elaborates about the idea of fragmentation, injury, and reinforced racism while explaining such concepts as “conocimiento,” which she defines as the creation of knowledge, experience, and interaction based on compassion. Keating includes a glossary of primary terms and concepts in order to help illuminate the complexity of these four important chronological sections. This glossary is followed by a thorough bibliography with new and previous sources that should be a solid beginning and continuation of Anzaldúan scholarship.

As a whole and as part of a wide range of Anzaldúa’s previously published works, The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader is significant because it presents important ideas about (post)colonization, nationalism, difference, identity (re)construction, sexuality, and coalition-building—all of which continue relevant to Latinas/os living in the United States. The book is a strong introduction and important addition for social justice workers, writers, teachers, and academics. Keating’s editing choices prove that Anzaldúa’s ideas began and continued to be diverse, inclusive, theoretical, and political in nature. This text is an ideal read and classroom text that should continue the conversations about race/ethnicity, gender, and sex/sexuality within Cultural Studies, Chicana/o Studies, Feminist Studies and Queer Studies.

© Carbajal 2011

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Call for Papers: Remembering Slavery, Forgetting Indenture?

Call for Papers:

Remembering Slavery, Forgetting Indenture?

9–10 September 2011
Bangor University, UK, in conjunction with the Centre for the Study of International Slavery in Liverpool

2011 marks the ten-year anniversary of the French Taubira law of 21 May 2001, which recognized the slave trade and slavery perpetrated in the Americas, the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean and Europe as a crime against humanity. This key date provides an opportunity to examine responses to memories of slavery which have emerged in France and internationally over the past decade. It enables us to reflect upon the recent substantial body of research that has been conducted into the cultural processes of remembering and representing slavery and the slave trade. Importantly, however, it also leads us to question whether this ‘memory law’ has opened up a space in which to explore memories of other, interconnected forms of colonial exploitation, such as indentured and forced labour. Has the emphasis on the need to defend the memory of the enslaved equated to a failure to recognize other forms of colonial and post-slavery exploitation?

The focus of this two-day conference will be on comparing the continuities and discontinuities between the ways in which slavery, indenture and forced labour have been remembered, narrativized and commemorated. It will bring into dialogue academics working on memories of slavery with those working on memories of indentured and forced labour systems, particularly in France and the former French colonies, but also extending to other global contexts. Confirmed keynote speakers are Dr Françoise Vergès (Goldsmiths, University of London), head of the Committee for the Memory and History of Slavery in France, and Professor Charles Forsdick, James Barrow Professor of French at the University of Liverpool. Taking a comparative, interdisciplinary approach, the conference will call into question the chronological and semantic divides between slavery and indenture by fostering debate around key questions, such as:

- Historical and contemporary definitions of slavery and forms of enslavement, indenture and forced labour: where to draw the lines?
- Processes of remembering, forgetting, commemorating and memorializing that have shaped representations of slavery, indenture and forced labour (in historiography, museums, literature, film, etc.)
- France's 'memory wars': colonialism, slavery and the problem of the devoir de mémoire
- Constructing identities and cultural memories of slavery and indentured labour in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries (for example, literary and political movements such as négritude, créolité, coolitude)
- Ongoing economic, cultural, social and political effects of slavery, indenture and forced labour in former colonial contexts


Individual papers should be no longer than 20 minutes. Please send a 250–300 word abstract and a brief biography to Nicola Frith (n.frith@bangor.ac.uk) or Kate Hodgson (K.Hodgson@liverpool.ac.uk) by 29 April 2011.

Sunday, March 13, 2011

"Black Is...Black Ain't": Reconceptualizing the African Diaspora

8th Annual Herman C. Hudson Symposium
"Black Is...Black Ain't": Reconceptualizing the African Diaspora
Keynote Speaker: Professor Michele Wallace

Saturday, March 26, 2011

8:15 AM – 6:00 PM

Indiana University-Bloomington, Indiana
Neal-Marshall Black Culture Center

Program information and flyer:
http://www.indiana.edu/~afroamer/CFPs.html

Description
The African Diaspora has been historically conceived as originating with the Transatlantic Slave trade. However, some would argue that to perceive the African Diaspora only in relation to slavery is to obscure alternative means of conceptualizing the movement of Black bodies. As scholars committed to interdisciplinary research, the Graduate Society of the Department of African American and African Diaspora Studies at Indiana University brings together scholars, community activists, artists, and other professionals to interrogate definitions of, theorize about, and imagine new possibilities for the African Diaspora.

Symposium papers will address the following topics:

* What are the practical applications of African American and African Diaspora Studies/Black Studies in the 21st century?
* How do migrations - local, national and international - affect diasporic identities?
* How does contemporary audio/visual media and popular culture help to re-imagine the borders of diasporic communities?
* How do outliers serve as change agents in these communities?
* What are the ways that the academy can engage in constructive dialogues with nonacademic communities?

Thursday, March 3, 2011

New Posts Coming Very Soon!

It's been a very long time since I've posted announcements, features, and updates on this blog. I've decided that Blogger will be the permanent home for this blog. With that decision made, new updates are forthcoming. Stay tuned.

Trailblazers



create your own slideshow